Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 202%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 08:41
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 158
2-Core 309
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 941
93% 760 Pts
64-Core 1196
74% 1196 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 5000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 302
Reflection 265
Parallax 315
246% 294 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 242
Splatting 178
194% 247 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 203%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 311 308 297 305 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,879
Write 1,548
Mixed 590
SusWrite 360
242% 1,094 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 55.9
215% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 837
685% 972 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 209%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
146GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 302 304 304 303 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 481
Mixed 412
SusWrite 318
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 56.1
191% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
410GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1283 1126 612 615 617 620 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,449
Write 1,294
Mixed 1,178
SusWrite 812
266% 1,183 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 83.1
283% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 1,574
DQ Write 1,434
DQ Mixed 1460
1,107% 1,489 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 262%
Great: 340%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$105
91GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 142 123 126 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
209GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 137 137 120 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 105
Write 140
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 132
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 28.4
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback