User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFUJITSU
MotherboardFUJITSU D3400-B2
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 10:18
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 108
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 282
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.6% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 99
Parallax 65.9
56% 77.7 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 61.9
53% 65 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0510B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 431
Write 44.4
Mixed 61.7
38% 179 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 15.9
56% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 25.7
42% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
19GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 141 143 149 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 140
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.5 2.6 2.3 2.4 3.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 5
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 2.7
11% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FH1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback