PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T1650 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1650 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180222 |
Uptime | 3.8 Days |
Run Date | Mar 05 '21 at 15:18 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 1962) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 196 177 175 169 165 MB/s
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
140GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 224 232 211 192 185 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
|||
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 128 130 131 131 131 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 307x |
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 147x |
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 81x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 73x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 63x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |