Razer Blade

Performance Results

Gaming 25%
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 22%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 07:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 185
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 378
43% 330 Pts
64-Core 504
34% 504 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 55.7
24% 38.6 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 57
44% 53.8 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 48%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 201 193 193 184 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 906
Write 784
Mixed 464
SusWrite 215
132% 592 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 18.3
91% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 18.7
96% 230 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 108 110 101 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 70.4
Write 92.1
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 106
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback