Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 02:07
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 445
61% 454 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 20.2
17% 19.6 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series 120GB-$99
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TG20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 107 87 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 367
Write 115
Mixed 152
SusWrite 96.7
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 27.5
120% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 79.2
72% 110 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 72%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
10GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 427
Mixed 390
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 60.6
197% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 358
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
SABRENT 1TB
422GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 32.4
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 13.2
20% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
47GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 34.6
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 12.7
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 63%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
221GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 25.9
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 12.5
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 14.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback