PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z97-A (all builds) |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151111 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 10 '21 at 02:07 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series 120GB-$99
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TG20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 107 87 103 101 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
SABRENT 1TB
422GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
47GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
221GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 2,310x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 1,185x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 420x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 791x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 342x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 307x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $798 |