Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics 10,258 User benchmarks, average bench 38% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 32.7 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 126 41% 75.8 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 220 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 371D) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.40.54 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 7.2 4% 5.9 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 6 Splatting 8.3 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.41% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L1 128GB 491 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9L1QFXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 110 108 107 107 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 769 Write 147 Mixed 200 SusWrite 111 66% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 25.3 91% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 188 143% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 926GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 108 116 117 117 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 162 Write 118 Mixed 69 SusWrite 115 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 192% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 1x4GB 2,414 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.2% Poor	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 239 17% 239 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16