Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 19:23
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 414
53% 402 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 68.8
56% 70.9 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 68.2
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 479 479 471 470 468 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,096
Write 1,319
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 521
238% 1,054 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 975
760% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 186%
Great: 297%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1.5TB
566GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 37 40 38 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 32.7
Write 26.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 38.4
23% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 103%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 80 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 107
Write 99.7
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 81.1
70% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 76%
Maxtor 6B300S0 300GB
127GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 38
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 31.9
23% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.8% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 23.6
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $402
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback