Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Memory 34.4 1-Core 16.7 2-Core 26.4 18% 25.8 Pts	4-Core 71.7 8-Core 70.2 10% 70.9 Pts	64-Core 79.5 5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C12D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.7 1% 1.93 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000 128GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT21K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 65 72 73 72 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 380 Write 353 Mixed 217 SusWrite 70.8 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 16.3 63% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 114 95% 139 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GB 1,365 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 230 17% 230 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 18%, 1,365 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16