| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140407 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 17 '21 at 01:27 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.7%
Good
|
58% 93 Pts
|
36% 300 Pts
|
24% 380 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49%
Average
|
49% 65.5 fps
|
49% 60.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 223 230 212 239 240 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
64% 283 MB/s
|
110% 39 MB/s
|
147% 225 MB/s
|
|
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 133 135 137 138 138 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
94% 128 MB/s
|
246% 1.8 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 132 136 137 136 136 MB/s
|
79.7%
Very good
|
90% 123 MB/s
|
255% 1.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49%
Average
|
51% 17.7 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
53% 76.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |