Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M7811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M7811
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100429
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 14:41
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 870-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 153
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 284
37% 272 Pts
64-Core 357
24% 357 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 73.3
56% 72.3 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 66.4
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 174 185 185 184 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Above average
Read 237
Write 224
Mixed 210
SusWrite 183
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 29.3
98% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 60%
Great: 123%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$50
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3FE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 123 124 127 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 124
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 75%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
900GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 87 89 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 84.6
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 89.7
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$45
908GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 162 162 160 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 162
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 106%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 30
Write 23.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 23.4
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. None RM51264BA1339.16FD None BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. None M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 10 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $279
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback