Packard SJV50MV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard SJV50MV  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50MV
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091224
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 16:40
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 21.9
7% 16.2 Pts
4-Core 27.9
8-Core 26.7
4% 27.3 Pts
64-Core 21.7
1% 21.7 Pts
Poor: 21% Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M
Acer(1025 0219) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.2
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.7
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0004LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 27 24 33 29 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 58.5
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 25.5
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 0.7
MC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 716
6% 716 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SJV50MV Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard SJV50MV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback