Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive359% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 81.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 272
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 800
77% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 153
Parallax 168
128% 159 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 135
Splatting 121
117% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3384 3719 3489 965 944 909 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,149
Write 3,584
Mixed 2,209
SusWrite 2,235
577% 2,544 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 81.8
272% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 1,262
922% 1,205 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 359%
Great: 492%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
447GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 484 483 481 483 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 482
Mixed 392
SusWrite 483
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64.6
216% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 293
220% 294 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 458 459 459 445 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 452
Mixed 448
SusWrite 429
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 55.7
185% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 172 173 174 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 166
Mixed 109
SusWrite 173
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 131 133 133 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 127
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 133
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 36.8
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 36
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback