Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '21 at 16:26
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 88.9 58% 86.7 Pts	4-Core 74.9 8-Core 104 11% 89.4 Pts	64-Core 61.4 4% 61.4 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FF8) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.8% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 143 Parallax 115 85% 121 fps	MRender 151 Gravity 106 Splatting 95.9 94% 118 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,879 Write 1,430 Mixed 1,092 325% 1,467 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 27.7 105% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 755 DQ Write 591 DQ Mixed 581 460% 642 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 347GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 933 1052 811 755 700 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,834 Write 983 Mixed 1,327 SusWrite 836 277% 1,245 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 21.7 102% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 788 DQ Write 492 DQ Mixed 607 461% 629 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 266 288 266 250 252 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.5% Good	Read 194 Write 252 Mixed 243 SusWrite 273 55% 241 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 29.6 93% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 353 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 419GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 271 313 319 296 288 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 424 Mixed 387 SusWrite 301 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 40.9 130% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 349 262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 129%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2.5TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 118 99 131 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 122 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 117 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3.5TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 201 209 194 186 189 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 20.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,865x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,609x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	556x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,303x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	650x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	640x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	857x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	566x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,321

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16