HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3577
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 10:05
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Memory 7.49 1-Core 10.8 2-Core 17 7% 11.8 Pts	4-Core 23.7 8-Core 35.2 4% 29.5 Pts	64-Core 25.6 2% 25.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3577) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.72 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Eaget SSD 120GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3S Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1627 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 176 (F2) Unknown 100 100 71 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	38.9% Below average	Read 391 Write 273 Mixed 332 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 2.33 20% 7.27 MB/s	DQ Read 19.5 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 2.53 6% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 156GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 177 2000 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3339 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5189 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3322 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 73 49 454361115 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 2239 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 122 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 673714 (C2) HDA temperature 120 96 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	36.1% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 62.2 Mixed 61.6 47% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.01% Terrible	MC Read 1.8 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.8 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.53 GB/s	Latency 428 9% 428 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Presario CQ57 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	32x
Celeron B800IntelBench 40%, 2,662 samples	29x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	21x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	74x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	33x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	12x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	8x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16