Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Memory 26.9 1-Core 33.9 2-Core 58.4 23% 39.7 Pts	4-Core 85.6 8-Core 111 13% 98.3 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1 0% 0.53 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD256GBS800 256GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 219 214 230 296 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 344 Write 252 Mixed 309 SusWrite 243 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 8.5 33% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 35.1 50% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 10 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 273 15% 273 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	89x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	49x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	35x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	161x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	84x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	37x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	145x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	28x
DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 35 samples	23x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16