Asus A58M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A58M-E  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 18:15
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 124
58% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 200
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 4.6
4% 5.93 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RS72V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 196 203 199 199 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 221
Write 185
Mixed 194
SusWrite 177
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 16.4
80% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 34.4
57% 109 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50%
Great: 84%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
229GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 36.2
Write 52
Mixed 29
SusWrite 72.1
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 0.3
204% 3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 0.7
16% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 64%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
135GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.1
Write 75.2
Mixed 39.2
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
275GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 53
Write 42.3
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 29.9
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A58M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $140
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback