Packard EasyNote TE69KB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPackard EasyNote TE69KB  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TE69KB
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 52
28% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 102
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 103
7% 103 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Acer(1025 076F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
1% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$40
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 366 361 343 344 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 431
Write 388
Mixed 384
SusWrite 354
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 28.6
95% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 141
116% 165 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.4
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EasyNote TE69KB Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE69KB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $32
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback