Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190318
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '21 at 08:08
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	59%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Memory 84.9 1-Core 151 2-Core 300 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 549 8-Core 923 90% 736 Pts	64-Core 1,354 84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2487) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	4.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 292 Parallax 218 5% 172 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 1 Splatting 3.2 2% 1.7 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 283 348 422 427 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 420 Write 449 Mixed 332 SusWrite 360 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 28 97% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 273 225% 321 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 131%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 285 352 426 431 355 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 469 Mixed 394 SusWrite 365 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 42.3 142% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 351 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 122%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1917 2013 1961 2012 1191 1134 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	301% Outstanding	Read 2,351 Write 2199 Mixed 1,521 SusWrite 1,705 436% 1,944 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 62.9 205% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 859 DQ Write 881 DQ Mixed 843 641% 861 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 301% Great: 371%
Samsung 860 Pro 4TB-$846 723 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 284 351 425 431 354 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 448 Mixed 433 SusWrite 364 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 42.5 146% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 353 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 131%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: MKAOA8P0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 130 143 143 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 130 Write 139 Mixed 77 SusWrite 138 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 90 92 94 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 126 Write 116 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 91.1 68% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 107%
Generic MassStorageClass 256GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 188GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 63 69 78 79 65 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 83 Write 72.5 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 70.5 97% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 3.4 182% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 2,641 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	62.7% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 20.3 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 14.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) - $499

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,726x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,520x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	526x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,461x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	580x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	554x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,076x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	681x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	311x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	413x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	320x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	265x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,574

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16