Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200609
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 186 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 329 40% 305 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 86%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X04c12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 120 103 56 24 50 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.6% Poor	Read 120 Write 257 Mixed 146 SusWrite 81.7 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 7.1 41% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 71.3 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 104 80% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB 4,421 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	203x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	164x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16