PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z490-P (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200413 |
Uptime | 5.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 03 '21 at 23:38 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 64% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-10600K-$144
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 124 110 106 109 105 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
236GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 118 118 118 119 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples | 3,255x |
Core i5-10600KIntel $144Bench 92%, 70,951 samples | 1,487x |
Core i7-10700KFIntel $200Bench 96%, 37,394 samples | 1,153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 1,871x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,089x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 666x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $965 |