Asus P7P55 LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 LX  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 21:09
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 134
61% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 264
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 38.7
33% 40.7 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 33.9
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 62 56 65 69 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 186
Write 121
Mixed 122
SusWrite 68.4
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 16.9
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 74.1
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 93.6
72% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
210GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 122 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 201
Write 191
Mixed 179
SusWrite 116
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 16.4
58% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 66.8
51% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 65%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
212GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 128 147 145 145 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 225
Write 240
Mixed 222
SusWrite 138
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 16.5
64% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 20.3
21% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$189
1TB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 128 147 145 145 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.2% Above average
Read 255
Write 231
Mixed 213
SusWrite 138
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 191
146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 118%
WDC WDS400T2B0A-00SM50 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 98 109 105 104 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 233
Write 244
Mixed 215
SusWrite 99.9
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 28.8
90% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 56.5
81% 151 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55 LX Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback