Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 419
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 22
Parallax 16.9
16% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,683
Write 2,215
Mixed 2,355
608% 2,751 MB/s
4K Read 207
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 34.7
376% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 57.6
DQ Mixed 96.2
107% 193 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
592GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 373 370 359 349 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 298
Write 366
Mixed 330
SusWrite 366
77% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 21.9
81% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 76
70% 112 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 118 116 116 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 110
Write 74.5
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 113
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
549GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 80 90 91 90 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 107
SusWrite 88
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
309GB free
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 82 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45% Average
Read 71.5
Write 72
Mixed 31
SusWrite 85.1
47% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 62%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
22GB free, PID 1000, samsung bar
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 24 26 26 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 212
Write 27.5
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 25.7
89% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 9.3
630% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 19.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback