Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 239 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 443 61% 454 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 9.4 Parallax 7.2 7% 8.4 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 8 6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 421 Write 424 Mixed 278 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 53.6 183% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 297 226% 305 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 109GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37% Below average	Read 58.9 Write 26.5 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 70 34% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	128x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $531

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16