| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110302 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 08 '21 at 07:59 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.7%
Good
|
74% 126 Pts
|
42% 344 Pts
|
32% 520 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.4%
Average
|
45% 59.8 fps
|
47% 57.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 138 138 138 138 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
71% 318 MB/s
|
128% 43.1 MB/s
|
162% 279 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.8%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
24% 8.33 GB/s
|
66% 60.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,037 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 458x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 286x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 100x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 112x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 71x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 57x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $849 |