PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Oegstone Q87M-E (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Q87M-E |
Memory | 7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160427 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 08 '21 at 08:37 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk SDIS6BM-256G-1006 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 6.8 9.6 15 53 43 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
212GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
76GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 176 179 179 173 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 13x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 9x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $114 |