Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 14:44
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$98
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 183
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 337
46% 337 Pts
64-Core 349
23% 349 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.8
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.1
3% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 380
Write 152
Mixed 197
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 33.3
130% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 115
99% 148 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$79
816GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 84.4
Write 80.9
Mixed 66.8
58% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 84%
VendorCo ProductCode 126GB
104GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 7
Write 6.7
Mixed 6.7
9% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 13%
VendorCo ProductCode 126GB
71GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5.7
Write 2.2
4% 3.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
46GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 18 17 17 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 15.7
Mixed 24
SusWrite 17.3
28% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
120% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 39%
USB Disk 3.0 125GB
116GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 7.2 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 38.8
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 6.7
40% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.4
157% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905471-069.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback