Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 08:26
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 241 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 656 68% 544 Pts	64-Core 832 52% 832 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.3% Excellent	Lighting 99.9 Reflection 94 Parallax 96.9 81% 96.9 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 88.3 Splatting 82.2 78% 97.7 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB 13,793 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 263 304 273 285 270 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 584 Write 546 Mixed 491 SusWrite 283 107% 476 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 25.8 93% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 673 DQ Write 453 DQ Mixed 480 381% 535 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 217 218 219 220 218 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 190 Mixed 75 SusWrite 216 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 252% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 23.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	890x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	694x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	573x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	483x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	439x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	388x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	505x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	321x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	167x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	492x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	309x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	194x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $584

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16