Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170-HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 506
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 534
36% 534 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 110
Parallax 147
81% 119 fps
MRender 93.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 75.3
81% 90.1 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 94%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 138 133 148 133 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 383
Write 341
Mixed 301
SusWrite 169
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 47.1
157% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 124%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
355GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 375 373 371 369 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 418
Mixed 333
SusWrite 372
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 40.7
146% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 258
219% 321 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$30
16GB free
Firmware: 3.CCA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 24
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 49.8
30% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 42%
Toshiba MK2546GSX 250GB-$22
65GB free
Firmware: LB014C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 32.9
Mixed 26
SusWrite 54.5
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 29%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$81
5GB free
Firmware: 02.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 63
Write 68.7
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 70.5
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$81
145GB free
Firmware: 02.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 78 81 76 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 81.6
Write 80.3
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 79.2
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 3,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $968
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $217Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback