Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 00:07
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$201
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 298
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 915
90% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
88% 109 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 103
Splatting 93.6
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,296
Write 1,230
Mixed 1,569
375% 1,698 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 80.8
270% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 849
627% 825 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Toshiba THNSNJ256GCSY 256GB
21GB free
Firmware: JYPA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 417
Mixed 412
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 28.3
88% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 186
140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 105%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
47GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 111 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 411
Write 120
Mixed 198
SusWrite 114
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 16.1
72% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 7.4
35% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 83%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
32GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 102 101 97 92 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,921
Write 414
Mixed 159
SusWrite 131
140% 656 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 42.1
136% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 142
149% 246 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 141%
Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 26
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 23.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $908
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback