PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5B-Deluxe (all builds) |
Memory | 0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080930 |
Uptime | 5.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 14 '21 at 01:26 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22OA70A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 23 18 21 36 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
465GB free
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 69 71 72 73 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
153GB free
Firmware: P22OA70A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 36 37 42 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 17x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 14x |
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $191 |