Emachines ET1862

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmachines ET1862  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ET1862
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 10:26
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 154
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 279
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 92.4
56% 74.7 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 48.5
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST3OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 54 65 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 87.2
Write 74.3
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 62
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
139GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 109
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
212GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 23
Write 24.4
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 25.7
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
158% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 80AD HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 017A 78.B1GDE.AU10C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1862 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1862

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback