Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$175
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
93% 162 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 818
86% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,054
71% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.8% Good
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 97.4
Parallax 84.7
60% 85.3 fps
MRender 86.3
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 85.8
75% 88.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 89%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 293 294 295 295 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 392
SusWrite 310
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59.2
201% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$135
424GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 459 469 465 477 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 420
SusWrite 467
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 61.4
206% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 139 137 138 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 150
Write 144
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 137
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$71
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 41
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 23.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $760
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback