Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 14:07
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$153 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Memory 86.6 1-Core 159 2-Core 287 97% 178 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 892 91% 735 Pts	64-Core 1,121 69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.4% Very good	Lighting 89.3 Reflection 102 Parallax 91.9 73% 94.5 fps	MRender 91 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 91 75% 91 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U512G1002 512GB 4,967 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 446 Write 311 Mixed 204 71% 321 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 48.3 177% 65.3 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 155 151% 243 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 256GB 2,656 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 199GB free Firmware: EXT08D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 259 259 260 260 259 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 496 Write 262 Mixed 254 SusWrite 259 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 98.1 4K Mixed 30.2 133% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 83.6 125% 237 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 90%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 204GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 458 329 28 73 303 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 455 Mixed 421 SusWrite 275 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 27.2 145% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 40 94% 190 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 34.7 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.4 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 36.4 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,621x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,227x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	854x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	820x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	700x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	622x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	304x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	374x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16