Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '21 at 04:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 55.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 219
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 380
52% 380 Pts
64-Core 400
27% 400 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 79%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 55 51 31 44 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 83.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 45.8
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback