MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '21 at 22:03
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 787
71% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,314
81% 1,314 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 055B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 78.1
46% 62.6 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 60
Splatting 43.1
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-create TM8FPE001T 1TB
613GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1218A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1178 1455 1457 1489 1406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 1,606
Mixed 1,131
SusWrite 1,409
339% 1,512 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 28.1
171% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 531
452% 666 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 244%
Great: 279%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
545GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 408 421 422 426 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 386
Write 342
Mixed 358
SusWrite 395
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 35.3
126% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 154
121% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 86%
Great: 102%
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: V2.11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1112 1106 1108 1102 1092 1114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,774
Write 1,095
Mixed 946
SusWrite 1,106
274% 1230 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 41.5
196% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 62.5
148% 293 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 215%
Great: 246%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
3TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 124 123 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 170
Write 178
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 123
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
322% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 104 106 106 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 26.6
Write 87.2
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 106
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 34.2
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 31.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,413
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback