Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 07:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 464
65% 480 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 68.6
56% 70.9 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 67.8
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 287 216 179 248 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 307
Write 141
Mixed 242
SusWrite 248
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 23.6
86% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 358
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
245GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 130 120 132 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 58
SusWrite 132
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 34 37 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 36
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 37.5
47% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 14.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback