Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory48.5 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 20:38
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 752
80% 639 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 105
Parallax 106
77% 102 fps
MRender 92.3
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 92.3
76% 93 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
364GB free
Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 575 589 590 595 596 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 680
Write 574
Mixed 465
SusWrite 580
129% 575 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 43
142% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 985
674% 829 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 140%
Great: 306%
Samsung PM830 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 227 222 222 230 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 214
Write 151
Mixed 244
SusWrite 227
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 20.4
83% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 118
101% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 73%
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G M.2 2280 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ABDA4105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 239 166 166 224 249 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 121%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
553GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 113 115 117 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 111
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 85%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
311GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 81.8
Write 70.7
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 96.9
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
160GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 66.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 80.1
46% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3H1 Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 16ATF2G64AZ-2G3E1 Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 56GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 29.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 26.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $544
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback