Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario KC690AA-ABM SG3209LA (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Iris8
Memory	1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080103
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '21 at 22:26
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon LE-1620 143 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 34.2 34% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 34.1 8-Core 35.2 5% 34.7 Pts	64-Core 33.5 2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 19.8 17% 19.2 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 20.1 Splatting 16 16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CH SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 44 43 51 51 53 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 52.8 Write 48.5 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 44.1 33% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16