Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 01:22
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 19.8 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 126 37% 72.6 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 371 37% 299 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 16,200 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 18F1) 3GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 27.4 21% 28 fps	MRender 19.5 Gravity 25.9 Splatting 20.5 18% 22 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 211 184 195 189 201 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,707 Write 988 Mixed 151 SusWrite 176 165% 755 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 45.3 148% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 458 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 368 271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 271%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 276GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 73 75 76 75 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 142 Write 126 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 76.9 72% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 16GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 22.7 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 10.2 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 322 12% 322 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	307x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	57x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	168x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	159x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	37x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	90x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	63x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	45x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	62x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	56x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16