Asrock H270 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H270 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 06:41
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 214 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 572 59% 476 Pts	64-Core 610 38% 610 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 16 15% 18.3 fps	MRender 24.1 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 16.1 16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 276 283 268 272 272 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	68% Good	Read 341 Write 280 Mixed 248 SusWrite 276 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 18.7 85% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 211 175% 252 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 265GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 188 190 189 188 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 150 Mixed 81.6 SusWrite 188 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 40GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 53.8 Mixed 41 SusWrite 53.9 38% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 49%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 412GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 86 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 67.5 Write 65.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 84.9 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 86%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 25GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 12 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 9.7 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 16.9 24% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.5 123% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.1% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 18.8 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Pro4 - $295

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	103x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	93x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16