Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110802
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 97.8 47% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 171 20% 156 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.3 Reflection 28.1 Parallax 20.4 12% 20.9 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 15 Splatting 24.8 18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 101 100 93 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.4% Poor	Read 156 Write 92.7 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 98 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 9 38% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 17.9 DQ Mixed 15 12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 102%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 717GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 99 101 100 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 104 Mixed 51 SusWrite 98.4 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 125GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 24.3 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 25.4 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 41GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	32.4% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 11.9 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16