Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1882 x 1058 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$368
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 279
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 1041
97% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,432
96% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$790
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 159
Parallax 158
123% 156 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 134
Splatting 116
114% 144 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 119%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 653 649 656 654 654 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 2,247
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,394
SusWrite 695
352% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 62
205% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 372
343% 543 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 224%
Great: 320%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
238GB free
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 278 280 280 228 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,060
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 303
218% 979 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 67.6
223% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 545
422% 588 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 175%
Great: 240%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
92GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 94 175 176 174 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 432
Write 458
Mixed 358
SusWrite 209
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 33.1
116% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 204
185% 281 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
663GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 133 134 134 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 134
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
940GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 102 102 102 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 114
Write 99.8
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 99.4
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $996
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback