Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	May 02 '21 at 10:01
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 201 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 693 63% 530 Pts	64-Core 1,090 67% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.3% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 59 Parallax 61.2 37% 55.2 fps	MRender 60.2 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 44.6 44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 56%
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	21% Poor	Lighting 26.2 Reflection 28 Parallax 36.6 21% 30.3 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 29 Splatting 20 20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 141 150 143 142 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 454 Write 216 Mixed 167 SusWrite 148 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 29.8 110% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 122 123% 201 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 91%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 292GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 50 56 51 59 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 119 Write 109 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 57.6 70% 94 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 388GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 92 87 93 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 81.5 Write 74.5 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 91.3 48% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	66.7% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 24.4 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 20 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	13x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16