Asus M51AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 14:51
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$277
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
82% 140 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 571
63% 486 Pts
64-Core 564
38% 564 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 8597) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.2
0% 5.3 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 9
Splatting 7.5
7% 8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$40
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 81 71 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 75.3
56% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$132
235GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 53
Mixed 38
SusWrite 68
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
782GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 26
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 27.7
36% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
196% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 53%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
390GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 19.4
41% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 53%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 34.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 19.1
39% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 1302 PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $642
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $285Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback