Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 15:36
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$237
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 184
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 544
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 632
42% 632 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$220
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 66.7
49% 57.6 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 45
52% 56.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0609B0L Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 260 691 298 294 556 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 631
Write 372
Mixed 456
SusWrite 461
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 17.1
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 312
240% 338 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 283%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$59
97GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 310 298 316 347 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 250
Write 206
Mixed 227
SusWrite 315
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 27.4
75% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 155
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 108%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
91GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 319 283 322 322 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 168
Write 248
Mixed 211
SusWrite 314
54% 235 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 15.8
58% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 188
149% 209 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$29
38GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 152 112 120 117 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 92
SusWrite 136
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
104GB free
Firmware: CC9D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 153 165 170 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 160
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 24.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 24,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback