Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	85 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	12.7 Days
Run Date	May 03 '21 at 21:51
Run Duration	306 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 184 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 601 57% 474 Pts	64-Core 1,021 63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.5% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 107 Parallax 196 93% 139 fps	MRender 92.4 Gravity 132 Splatting 75.2 80% 99.9 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 330 246 104 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 417 Write 388 Mixed 336 SusWrite 199 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 33.9 110% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 238 202% 297 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 169 46 43 45 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 407 Write 386 Mixed 323 SusWrite 116 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 33.7 112% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 251 216% 320 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 164GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1661 1073 739 743 733 736 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1,995 Write 1808 Mixed 1,497 SusWrite 948 350% 1,562 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 51.4 164% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 482 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 442 320% 419 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 355%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 107 107 107 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 94 Write 100 Mixed 77 SusWrite 107 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 89 91 88 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 105 Write 80.3 Mixed 40 SusWrite 87.5 57% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 135 133 133 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 97 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 132 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 83%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 7.7 8.4 8.1 6.4 6.8 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 198 Write 180 Mixed 110 SusWrite 8.4 153% 124 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1.3 237% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 81%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 8TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 152 152 150 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 210 Write 210 Mixed 121 SusWrite 151 228% 173 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.3 246% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 81%
ST10000V N0004-1ZD101 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 155 154 153 151 155 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 225 Write 207 Mixed 121 SusWrite 152 230% 176 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.3 238% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GP-DSG64G32 4x31.8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 29.4 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 20.5 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 159%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)