Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 23:37
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 161
2-Core 316
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,116
101% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,660
111% 1,660 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 240
Parallax 275
227% 265 fps
MRender 307
Gravity 233
Splatting 167
196% 235 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 213%
Great: 228%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1550 817 590 495 466 480 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,573
Write 1,757
Mixed 1,425
SusWrite 733
308% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 80.7
281% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 1,127
853% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 246%
Great: 274%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 420 425 405 397 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 454
Mixed 392
SusWrite 419
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 47
168% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 209
158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
153GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1753 1280 1245 1085 979 925 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,684
Write 2,591
Mixed 2,006
SusWrite 1,211
476% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 97.9
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,298
DQ Write 1124
DQ Mixed 1,234
919% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 242%
This bench: 337%
Great: 377%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
361GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 119 120 119 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 7.2
Write 34.4
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 120
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 194 193 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 148
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 191
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 28.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback