PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX B365-G GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190725 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | May 04 '21 at 01:41 |
Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
|
6.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 437 440 120 34 34 MB/s
|
90%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
2GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 34 34 34 34 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
169GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 144 140 147 139 138 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
51GB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 76 75 75 76 MB/s
|
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
64GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 41 40 MB/s
|
22%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
51GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 74 74 74 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
679GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 78 80 79 80 77 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
41.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 243x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 86x |
Core i5-9600KFIntel $180Bench 93%, 65,122 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 67x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 53x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $446 |