Supermicro PIO-648R-E1CR36L+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemSupermicro PIO-648R-E1CR36L+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRi-T4+
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 07:49
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 171
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 609
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 2,003
134% 2,003 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 849E) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 72
Parallax 87.9
52% 74.7 fps
MRender 82.6
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 60.9
62% 73.3 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: S4300101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 361 370 369 374 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 418
Mixed 380
SusWrite 370
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 45.7
156% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 273
227% 326 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LIV9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 108 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
60% Good
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 102
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
389% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 60%
Great: 64%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$109
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 183 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 159
Mixed 29
SusWrite 188
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 145 146 148 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 161
Write 141
Mixed 101
SusWrite 147
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 86%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0OA5M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 105
63% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 58%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$109
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 181 187 183 183 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 171
Mixed 32
SusWrite 184
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23.8
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 18.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PIO-648R-E1CR36L+-ST031 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Supermicro PIO-648R-E1CR36L+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback