Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 29.7 1-Core 44.9 2-Core 82.7 30% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 132 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39BF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.7 2% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: LDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 13 13 9.9 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 57.2 Write 14.4 Mixed 12 SusWrite 11.7 17% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	25.7% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.4 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	250x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	175x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	142x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	99x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	177x
RMT3170NE68F9F1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 18%, 710 samples	80x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	34x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16